Best Crypto Wallets With High Staking Rewards in 2026
Crypto staking has become one of the most popular ways for cryptocurrency holders to potentially earn additional tokens without actively trading. Instead of leaving Proof-of-Stake assets idle, users can delegate or stake them to help secure blockchain networks and receive rewards in return.
However, the highest advertised APY is not always the most important factor. Fees, validator quality, lock-up periods, self-custody, supported assets, and unstaking flexibility can significantly affect the real value of staking.
This guide explores seven crypto wallets and wallet platforms with staking features, including Trust Wallet, Ledger Wallet, Atomic Wallet, Exodus, Base App, MetaMask, and Phantom. It compares their supported staking assets, notable features, potential reward rates, advantages, and limitations so crypto users can understand how each platform approaches staking in 2026.
Important: Staking rewards are variable and are not guaranteed. Rates can change frequently, and crypto prices can fall even while your token balance increases.
What Is Crypto Staking?
Crypto staking involves committing Proof-of-Stake (PoS) cryptocurrency to a blockchain’s validation system. Depending on the network, you may delegate tokens to a validator, participate through a staking pool, or use liquid staking.
In exchange, the network distributes rewards, usually in the same cryptocurrency being staked.
For example, users can stake assets such as:
- Ethereum (ETH)
- Solana (SOL)
- Cosmos (ATOM)
- Polkadot (DOT)
- Cardano (ADA)
- Injective (INJ)
- Near (NEAR)
- Sui (SUI)
The important distinction is that staking rewards come primarily from the underlying blockchain, not simply from the wallet application. A wallet provides the interface and infrastructure through which users access staking.
List of Best High Staking Rewards Crypto Wallets:
1. Trust Wallet
Trust Wallet is one of the most extensive options for users who want to stake multiple Proof-of-Stake assets from a self-custody wallet. Its official staking page currently lists 25+ in-wallet staking options, although availability and rates can change.
Among the higher advertised rates on its current staking page are Juno at around 22.69%, Kusama around 15.35%, Terra around 15%, Cosmos around 14.72%, Polkadot around 14.66%, Axelar around 13.78%, Injective around 8.40%, NEAR around 7.88% and BNB around 6.34%.
Key features
- 25+ in-wallet staking options
- Self-custody wallet model
- Built-in staking interface
- Staking estimator for potential rewards
- Support for major assets such as ETH, SOL, TRX, DOT, ATOM, INJ, NEAR and ADA
- Mobile-focused experience
- Rewards and staking information available directly inside the wallet
- Access to multiple blockchain ecosystems
Trust Wallet is particularly interesting for users looking beyond ETH and SOL because its supported staking list includes several assets with comparatively high network yields.
Higher-reward assets currently listed
| Token | Advertised APR* |
|---|---|
| Juno (JUNO) | ~22.69% |
| Kusama (KSM) | ~15.35% |
| Cosmos (ATOM) | ~14.72% |
| Polkadot (DOT) | ~14.66% |
| Axelar (AXL) | ~13.78% |
| Injective (INJ) | ~8.40% |
| NEAR | ~7.88% |
| BNB | ~6.34% |
*Rates displayed by Trust Wallet can change.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Large range of staking assets | High APY assets can carry higher token-price risk |
| Self-custody | Rates can change |
| Simple mobile experience | Some networks have their own lock-up rules |
| Built-in reward estimator | Availability can vary by region/network |
2. Ledger Wallet / Ledger Live
Ledger Wallet, formerly widely associated with Ledger Live, combines software access with Ledger hardware security. This makes it different from purely software-based wallets because private keys remain protected by the Ledger hardware device.
Ledger currently supports staking across a growing selection of assets, including ETH, SOL, ATOM, DOT, ADA, AVAX, NEAR, ICP, HBAR, TRX, XTZ and others.
For Ethereum, Ledger currently advertises approximately 2–4% APY, depending on the staking provider and conditions. Ledger states that its ETH staking options include providers such as Kiln and Lido, with returns varying by provider.
Key features
- Hardware-wallet security
- Staking through the Ledger Wallet application
- Validator selection for supported networks
- Reward tracking
- Support for numerous PoS assets
- Compatibility with third-party Web3 wallets
- Private keys remain on the hardware device
- ETH staking options with different providers
Major staking assets
- Ethereum (ETH)
- Solana (SOL)
- Cosmos (ATOM)
- Polkadot (DOT)
- Cardano (ADA)
- Avalanche (AVAX)
- Near (NEAR)
- Internet Computer (ICP)
- Hedera (HBAR)
- Tron (TRX)
- Tezos (XTZ)
- Algorand (ALGO)
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Hardware-level security | Requires a Ledger hardware device |
| Broad staking support | Some services use third-party providers |
| Validator choice on supported networks | Rates vary by provider |
| Good for long-term holders | Initial hardware cost |
Ledger is particularly relevant for users who put security and self-custody ahead of chasing the highest headline APY.
3. Atomic Wallet
Atomic Wallet is another self-custody wallet with a large selection of staking assets. Its official staking page currently lists more than 20 assets and advertises potential yields reaching above 20% for some tokens.
Current figures listed by Atomic include approximately 24% for Zilliqa, 25% for Terra LUNA, 21% for Nibiru Chain, 20% for Atomic Wallet Token, 15% for Cosmos, 13% for Band Protocol, 13% for Monad and 10% for Akash Network.
Key features
- 20+ staking assets
- 30+ blockchain support
- Self-custody
- Buy, swap and stake from one interface
- Validator selection for supported assets
- Automatic rewards for some assets
- Manual claiming for certain networks
- Desktop and mobile access
Higher advertised staking rates
| Token | Approx. ROI shown by Atomic |
|---|---|
| Terra LUNA | ~25% |
| Zilliqa (ZIL) | ~24% |
| Nibiru Chain (NIBI) | ~21% |
| Atomic Wallet Token | ~20% |
| Cosmos (ATOM) | ~15% |
| Band Protocol (BAND) | ~13% |
| Monad | ~13% |
| Akash Network (AKT) | ~10% |
These rates are estimates published by Atomic Wallet and can change.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| High advertised rates on several assets | High-yield tokens can be highly volatile |
| Large selection | Rewards vary by network |
| Self-custody | Some assets require manual claiming |
| Integrated swap and staking tools | Network lock-up rules still apply |
4. Exodus
Exodus focuses on making crypto management simple across desktop, mobile and Web3 environments. It supports staking for several major PoS assets and displays estimated APYs within its staking interface.
Current supported staking assets include ETH, APT, ADA, ATOM, INJ, KAVA, Polygon and SOL, along with Tezos.
For Solana, Exodus states that users can stake SOL through its self-custody wallet and receive rewards every epoch, typically every 2–4 days after the relevant staking process.
Key features
- Self-custody
- Desktop, mobile and Web3 wallet
- Built-in staking dashboard
- Estimated APY information
- Staking calculator
- Support for Ledger for selected assets
- Staking transaction history
- Easy access to staking from supported asset wallets
Staking assets
- Ethereum (ETH)
- Solana (SOL)
- Cardano (ADA)
- Cosmos (ATOM)
- Injective (INJ)
- Kava (KAVA)
- Polygon (MATIC)
- Aptos (APT)
- Tezos (XTZ)
Exodus does not present one permanent universal APY because yields vary by asset and network conditions. Users can view current estimated APYs in the wallet.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Clean and beginner-friendly interface | Smaller staking selection than Trust Wallet |
| Self-custody | Some assets are locked during staking |
| Desktop and mobile support | APYs change |
| Supports hardware wallets for selected assets | Unstaking periods vary by asset |
5. Base App
The Base App takes a different approach. Rather than offering a large list of native staking assets, its current staking feature is primarily focused on Ethereum (ETH) and liquid-staking options.
According to Coinbase’s current Base documentation, users can stake any amount of ETH through the Base app without needing the 32 ETH normally associated with running a native Ethereum validator. ETH is deposited into a staking smart contract and delegated to Coinbase Developer Platform validators.
Base also provides access to liquid staking options, which can allow users to maintain more flexibility with their staked position.
Key features
- ETH staking from the Base app
- No 32 ETH requirement
- On-chain staking
- Liquid-staking options
- Automatic restaking of rewards
- Daily reward balance updates
- Base ecosystem integration
- Access to trading, payments and on-chain applications
Base currently charges a 15% commission on ETH staking rewards, according to its documentation, although the estimated APR shown before staking is net of applicable commissions.
Main staking asset
Ethereum (ETH)
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| ETH staking with any amount | Primarily focused on ETH |
| Liquid staking options | 15% commission currently stated by Base |
| Rewards automatically restaked | Gas fees apply |
| Integrated with Base ecosystem | Rewards are not guaranteed |
Base is therefore more suitable for someone primarily holding ETH rather than someone searching for a wallet with dozens of high-APY staking assets.
6. MetaMask
MetaMask has expanded beyond its traditional role as an Ethereum/Web3 wallet with built-in earning options. Its staking ecosystem currently includes pooled ETH staking, validator staking and liquid staking.
With pooled staking, users can stake any amount of ETH. MetaMask also offers validator staking for users depositing between 32 and 2,048 ETH per validator, while liquid staking options include providers such as Lido and Rocket Pool.
Key features
- ETH pooled staking
- Validator staking
- Liquid staking
- Lido and Rocket Pool integrations
- No 32 ETH requirement for pooled staking
- Ability to withdraw according to the relevant staking method
- DeFi compatibility with liquid staking tokens
- Self-custody wallet environment
Main staking assets
Ethereum (ETH) is the core native staking asset through MetaMask.
Liquid staking can also provide access to staking-related assets such as:
- stETH
- rETH
- Other provider-specific liquid staking tokens
MetaMask states that its pooled staking lets users deposit any amount of ETH and earn yield daily.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Flexible ETH staking options | Primarily ETH-focused for native staking |
| Pooled staking without 32 ETH | Liquid staking adds smart-contract/provider risk |
| DeFi integration | Rewards vary |
| Multiple staking approaches | Gas fees may apply |
MetaMask makes the most sense for users who already use Ethereum and DeFi applications and want staking integrated into that ecosystem.
7. Phantom Wallet
Phantom has evolved from a predominantly Solana-focused wallet into a multichain wallet supporting ecosystems including Solana, Ethereum, Base, Polygon, Sui and Bitcoin. Its staking functionality remains particularly strong around Solana (SOL).
Phantom allows users to choose between native Solana staking and liquid staking. With native staking, users select a validator and delegate SOL. With Phantom’s liquid staking option, SOL can be converted into PSOL, a yield-bearing liquid staking token.
Key features
- Native SOL staking
- Liquid SOL staking
- PSOL liquid staking token
- Validator selection
- Self-custody
- Multichain wallet
- Hardware-wallet support
- Built-in swaps and cross-chain functionality
- Solana DeFi integration
Phantom does not publish one fixed SOL APY because native staking rewards depend on validator and network conditions. Its liquid staking system is designed to capture staking rewards plus additional network-related rewards.
Main staking assets
- Solana (SOL)
- PSOL through Phantom liquid staking
- ETH through third-party liquid staking integrations
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong Solana staking experience | Staking is concentrated around SOL |
| Native and liquid staking | Validator performance affects rewards |
| Self-custody | Liquid staking introduces additional protocol risk |
| Multichain support | SOL remains the primary staking asset |
Crypto Wallet Staking Comparison
| Wallet | Main staking assets | Notable advertised/current rates | Staking model |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Wallet | ETH, SOL, DOT, ATOM, INJ, NEAR, BNB and others | Up to ~22.69% on listed assets | Native/network staking |
| Ledger Wallet | ETH, SOL, ATOM, DOT, ADA, AVAX and others | ETH ~2–4% | Hardware-secured staking |
| Atomic Wallet | ETH, SOL, ATOM, ZIL, NIBI and others | Up to ~25% on listed assets | Native staking |
| Exodus | ETH, SOL, ADA, ATOM, INJ, KAVA and others | Variable by asset | Self-custody staking |
| Base App | ETH | Variable | ETH + liquid staking |
| MetaMask | ETH | Variable | Pooled, validator and liquid staking |
| Phantom | SOL, PSOL, ETH liquid staking | Variable | Native + liquid staking |
Rates are not directly comparable because they may be quoted as APY, APR or estimated ROI, and they can change at different times. Official wallet interfaces should be checked before staking.
What to Look for in a High-Staking-Reward Wallet
Choosing a wallet solely because it displays the highest APY can be misleading. Consider these factors before committing funds:
1. Actual net reward
Look at the reward after validator commissions, wallet fees and network fees rather than focusing only on the headline percentage.
2. Lock-up period
Some assets can be unstaked quickly, while others may require days or weeks. For example, Exodus states that Cosmos has a 21-day unstaking period, while Solana’s timing can vary by epoch and network conditions.
3. Self-custody
With self-custody wallets, the user controls the private keys. That also means the user is responsible for protecting the recovery phrase.
4. Validator selection
Validator performance, commission and uptime can influence actual rewards. Ledger and Phantom both provide mechanisms for choosing or evaluating validators on supported networks.
5. Liquid staking
Liquid staking can provide more flexibility because users receive a token representing their staked position. However, it introduces additional smart-contract and protocol risks.
6. Supported cryptocurrencies
If you hold DOT, ATOM, INJ, NEAR or other PoS assets, a wallet supporting those networks may be more useful than one focused almost exclusively on ETH.
Are High Staking Rewards Worth It?
A high staking percentage does not automatically mean a higher real-world return.
Suppose one token offers a 20% staking yield but falls substantially in market value. The additional tokens earned may not compensate for the decline in the asset’s price.
This is why staking should be evaluated using three separate factors:
Staking yield + token price movement + fees
For example, Trust Wallet and Atomic Wallet currently display some of the highest headline staking rates among the wallets reviewed here, but many of those rates belong to smaller or more volatile cryptocurrencies.
Meanwhile, Ledger, MetaMask and Base offer more ETH-focused approaches where the headline yield is generally lower but the staking ecosystem is centered around Ethereum.
Final Thoughts
The best crypto wallet for staking depends on the assets you already hold and the type of staking experience you want.
Trust Wallet and Atomic Wallet stand out for the breadth of assets and comparatively high advertised rates on certain tokens. Ledger is focused on hardware-backed security and broad staking access. Exodus emphasizes ease of use and self-custody, while MetaMask provides multiple Ethereum staking routes.
Base is primarily an ETH-focused option, while Phantom is particularly relevant to SOL holders who want both native and liquid staking.
Before staking, compare the current APY, validator commission, lock-up period, unstaking conditions, network fees and risks. Most importantly, remember that staking increases your token balance but does not protect you from the market value of the underlying cryptocurrency.